It’s very interesting to see the cost per rider for some of TriMet’s routes. It brings up the point, that maybe, we SHOULD cut more lines or find some way to make them more efficient. Such as finding a way to get volunteer drivers or part time drivers that would drive commuter vans or something. There HAS to be a way to reduce the absurdity of some of these costs. For instance, and these numbers come from TriMet, a few of these routes are insane.
Bus lines proposed to be discontinued
| Bus Line |
Rides Per Vehicle Hour |
Cost Per Ride |
Alternative Service Nearby |
|
41-Tacoma
|
16.9
|
$5.50
|
19, 33, 70, 99
|
|
74-Lloyd District/Southeast
|
21.7
|
$4.28
|
4, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 66, 70, 75
|
|
86-Alderwood
|
11.3
|
$15.61
|
72
|
|
153-South End Rd Loop
|
8.3
|
$11.20
|
|
|
System average:
|
34.6
|
$2.72
|
|
Why in the world, for economic and environmental reasons, do we put up with these routes? Sure TriMet is trying to expand ridership or whatever, but these routes are and have been absolutely stupid. I don’t care who they’re carrying around, if the cost is $11.20 or $15.61 I absolutely dread figuring out what the actual environmental impact is compared to anything else on the routes, such as say a nasty ole 10 year old SUV.
One looks at the system average, those are the numbers we need to run transit close to and around. I’m sure several routes do much better even than the $2.72. A simple rule should be followed, if one can’t keep the cost per rider below that of a single occupancy Ford Explorer, they should be running that route. I’m pretty sure, last I checked, a brand new Ford Explorer based on averages would run ya about $8-10 bucks per ride (of course, nobody buying a car EVER thinks of it that way, but it boils down to about that).
Anyone else out there got opinions on this matter? Should we be running routes like the #86 and #153? What do people think about the fact we provide handicap service at over $50 per ride? Not regular bus service, but custom taxi style service at $50 bucks a ride. We could pay for actual handicap taxies to provide this service for over half the price! Why are we giving handicap people crappier rides, shorting taxi drivers dollars and business, and charging ourselves (ya know, we the taxpayers) to provide this service in a rather messed up illogical, environmentally unfriendly (I promise you those Toyota vans the taxis use are WAY more efficient and cleaner than those diesel – even biodiesel – spewing buses TriMet uses), economically unsustainable way? It’s nice that the city & TriMet decides we should pay for these rides out of public funds but sometimes they need to bring a little more harsh reality into the decision making for these routes.
Free Public Transit?
Meanwhile I read this guys blog every once in a while and honestly find it interesting enough that I have it on my blogroll. It’s a blog about “free transit”. This guy proposes all transit to be “Free” in cost to users. I haven’t seen a single note, thought, or write up regarding how he would propose we actually pay for the transit so it could be free, but he rants and raves about places making transit free (or parts of it, as it usually happens).
Ugh, please, somebody in charge start thinking these things through! 😦
…ok, next entry, I promise, will have a more positive non-political rant mode to it.